Courses by Industry Authorities
PDH Certified Training
Self-paced & Instructor-led
  • Professional online training platform for engineers

    Advance your engineering career

    ASME and EN code-aligned training designed for piping and mechanical engineering teams working in Oil & Gas, Chemicals & Petrochemicals, and Power Generation. 

  • hero-individual-engineer-male

Used by engineering teams at leading EPCs, OEMs and operators worldwide

  • partner-logos-group1-noir
  • partner-logos-group2-noir
  • partner-logos-group3-noir
  • How engineers use EngineeringTrainer

    EngineeringTrainer helps you make confident engineering decisions while working on real projects.
  • Accelerate career progression

    • Move from designer to stress engineer
    • Take ownership of load cases and modelling assumptions
    • Strengthen fundamentals before signing off calculations
  • Progress toward senior engineering responsibility with structured, role-aligned learning.
  • screenshot-notebook-senior-piping-engineer-learning-journey
  • screenshot-mobile-fiberglass-reinforced-plastic
  • Prepare for project kick-off

    • Refresh critical code clauses before detailed engineering
    • Standardise load case construction and combinations
    • Align modelling assumptions early
  • Fewer assumption-driven corrections and reduced late-stage rework.
  • Review and approve outsourced work

    • Cross-check load cases and combinations
    • Validate SIF application and allowables
    • Review nozzle loads, flange checks, PED categorisation
  • Strengthen acceptance decisions before deliverables move forward.
  • screenshot-tablet-acoustic-and-flow-induced-vibrations
  • screenshot-desktop-pv-elite
  • Use engineering software with confidence

    • For engineers using CAESAR II, PV Elite, BOSfluids and similar tools:
    • Understand the equations behind software outputs
    • Recognise modelling limitations and boundary conditions
    • Identify overstress mechanisms early
  • Stronger interpretation reduces fundamental errors and prevents software-driven rework from reaching senior review.
  • What slows engineering delivery

    Delays are rarely caused by a lack of effort. They result from constraints within the team that surface as project deadlines approach.
  • Limited senior engineer capacity

    Heavy reliance on senior review constrains delivery speed.


    • Senior engineers review most critical deliverables
    • Foundational misunderstandings are corrected in review
    • Junior engineers depend on one-to-one clarification
    • Technical discussions remain surface-level


    This senior-led mentoring approach works, but it does not scale. Limited senior capacity delays critical approval stages.
  • Rework from incorrect assumptions

    Incorrect assumptions lead to late-stage rework.


    • Load cases constructed incorrectly
    • Support arrangements requiring repeated revisions
    • Code clauses applied outside their intended scope
    • Fatigue, stress limits or boundary conditions misinterpreted


    These issues often surface only during review. By then, correction becomes rework, and rework slows delivery.
  • Slow progression to senior-level competence

    Engineers take longer to reach autonomous engineering judgement.


    • Limited time for structured engineering learning
    • Reliance on reactive, on-the-job learning
    • Engineering competence varies across the team
    • Extended dependence on senior validation


    Learning on the job remains essential. But slow progression to senior-level competence constrains delivery capacity and slows project velocity.
  • Accelerating engineering delivery

    EngineeringTrainer strengthens technical capability while projects continue progressing.
  • Build engineering foundations team-wide

    Strong foundations reduce dependency on senior capacity.


    • Foundational knowledge is distributed across the team
    • Junior engineers ask technically grounded questions
    • One-to-one mentoring discussions become more effective and higher-level
    • Senior engineers focus on validating complex decisions rather than correcting basics


  • Strengthen engineering judgement

    Strong code interpretation leads to robust design decisions.


    • Code requirements are understood in context, not memorised
    • Practical limitations beyond the code are recognised
    • Design decisions reflect engineering judgement, not just compliance
    • Fundamental errors are identified earlier, not in late-stage review
  • Raise team competence without interrupting delivery

    Competence grows without slowing projects.


    • On-demand access to discipline-specific technical topics
    • Structured learning paths aligned with engineering roles
    • No travel or extended absence from active projects
    • Learning integrated into ongoing project work

Outcomes for engineering teams

When dependency on senior capacity is reduced, assumptions are corrected earlier, and competence grows continuously, delivery performance improves measurably.

 

  • icon-increase-capacity-white-64

    Increased senior engineering capacity

    Senior engineers spend less time correcting fundamentals and more time validating complex decisions. Critical approval stages move faster, reducing review bottlenecks.
  • icon-proofread-white-64

    Fewer late-stage corrections

    Stronger foundations and code interpretation prevent assumption-driven rework. Design decisions remain refinement, not redesign.

  • icon-rocket-white-64

    Accelerated progression to senior-level competence

    Engineers reach senior-level judgement earlier. Delivery capacity increases without adding headcount or disrupting active projects.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions